The Youth’s History in Ghana’s Independence

Ghana was the first country to gain independence in Sub-Saharan Africa on 6th March 1957. Ghana’s path to freedom was fuelled by growing nationalistic sentiment, spearheaded by figures like Kwame Nkrumah, decades of resistance, and calls for self-government, coupled with gradual increases in autonomy through constitutional development. These ultimately led to Ghana breaking free from colonial rule and inspiring other African countries to follow suit.


Historical Context and Colonial Legacy

Control of the British over Gold Coast was legitimised and spread with the bond of 1844, initially signed by most Fante Chiefs to cede jurisdiction of their states over to the British under the impression of protection by the British [16][8]. The British implemented tax collection and other laws as their influence spread to coastal areas in the 1850s until the second of four Anglo-Ashanti wars, from 1863 to 1864, between the then-sovereign Ashanti Empire and the British colony [13].

After the British displaced the Dutch from the Gold Coast, the Ashanti Empire lost allies and was increasingly weakened until a British military invasion that led to the deposition of Prempeh I, the Asantehene of the Ashanti Empire, rendering British colonial rule absolute, despite the Yaa Asantewaa war following the exile of the Asantehene [29].

After that, socioeconomic development in the Gold Coast skyrocketed as the youth received formal education and poverty rates decreased from the export of timber and gold and newly introduced crops, such as coffee and cocoa. Additionally, infrastructural development such as water supply, drainage, hydroelectric projects, public buildings, schools, hospitals, prisons, and communication lines, among others, was undertaken under the then-governor, Gordon Guggisberg.

Introducing elementary and secondary schools promoted primary and higher education among the youth. However, this initiative was preferentially executed, leading to the formation of the ‘Ghanaian elite’ made of Chiefs, sons or relatives of Chiefs, or upwardly mobile men in the African communal societies who were privy to the decision-making process of the colony.

This led to the creation of classes within the people of the Gold Coast: rural working class, urban working class, and, at the top, the national bourgeoisie. Though the bourgeoisie exploited the working class, they ushered in the concept of nationalism as a maladaptive response of the majority to the xenocentric education they received and the centralised governance of colonial rule [14][19].

Youth Mobilization and Ideological Formation

Nationalist ideas fostered by the capitalist bourgeoisie catalysed the formation of the Gold Coast Aborigines’ Rights Protection Society (ARPS) in 1897. ARPS emerged in Cape Coast, Ghana, a crucial centre for intellectual and political resistance during colonial rule. The trigger for its formation came in response to the proposed Lands Bill, which threatened to empower the colonial government to seize “waste” or public lands. This move, seen as detrimental to African land ownership, roused the Ghanaian elite and urban youth, leading to the establishment of ARPS.

The ARPS actively protested the Lands Bill, even sending a delegation to London to directly address Joseph Chamberlain, the British Secretary of State. This delegation, marked by inclusivity, disclosed a broader unification against the bill.

Their efforts proved successful, as Chamberlain pledged support for dismissing the Lands Bill and preserving “native law” regarding land ownership. Though the influence of the ARPS declined, it formed the seminal resistance that eventually led to the fight for independence [18].

The Role of the Youth in Nationalist Movements

In the 1930s, I.T.A. Wallace-Johnson rose to prominence in British West Africa. A passionate organiser and Pan-Africanist from Sierra Leone, Wallace-Johnson saw the injustices of colonial rule and dedicated himself to challenging the status quo. He advocated for a radical approach, introducing Marxist ideas and strategies aimed at mobilising the masses for political change.

One of Wallace-Johnson’s most significant contributions was founding the West African Youth League (WAYL) in 1935. This organisation rapidly gained a large and committed following by focusing on securing greater liberties and opportunities for the people of the Gold Coast (modern-day Ghana) and other West African colonies.

The WAYL distinguished itself by embracing inclusivity and challenging societal divisions. It advocated for equality, workers’ rights, and unity across tribal lines, fostering a sense of shared struggle among the populace.

The WAYL’s methods were as bold as its message. They organised mass rallies, published newspapers to spread their ideas widely, and actively championed the cause of trade unions, empowering workers to fight for their rights. This approach stood in stark contrast to the traditional elite-centred political movements prevalent at the time.

The colonial authorities noticed the WAYL’s success. Alarmed by the organisation’s growing popularity and its leader’s radical ideas, they sought to put an end to any potential uprising. Wallace-Johnson faced various forms of suppression, including imprisonment, aimed at hindering his activities and silencing his voice.

Despite its challenges, the WAYL played a crucial role in West Africa’s history with its short but impactful existence, championed by youthful and consistent insistence to be heard and treated fairly. It demonstrated the power of mass mobilisation and its effectiveness in demanding greater self-determination for African colonies.

The legacy of Wallace-Johnson, as a pioneering figure in the anti-colonial struggle, continues to inspire those fighting for social justice and equality [24].

Additionally, young people entered politics through the “Verandah Boys” movement, which emerged from the post-World War II mass nationalist movement. These were made up of alienated and disaffected young men and women, some working, others jobless, who, in the years leading up to independence, assisted Kwame Nkrumah and others in transforming elite nationalism into mass-based politics. They served as the foot soldiers whose activism in a variety of fields provided the catalyst for a quicker march towards independence.

This victorious historical narrative, however, ultimately turns into a tale of failure as youth ascent to prominence in nationalist politics throughout Africa was quickly curtailed by their repression or entrapment in postcolonial state-building initiatives that aimed to downplay generational, class, and gender disparities and demands in the service of national unity [29].


The Declaration of Independence: Youth at the Forefront

The National Congress of British West Africa, convened in 1920 by Joseph E. Casely-Hayford, an African member of the Legislative Council, stipulated the need for numerous innovations and reforms in the Gold Coast. The National Congress then sent a delegation to the Colonial Office to demand local representation in government. This marked the first show of political unity among the region’s intellectuals and nationalist youth [13].

This step, substantiated by the advocacy of WAYL and other uprisings, led to the British allowing African parties to contest elections after World War II (1945). However, these elections would first involve only the parties loyal to the British colony – those formed by traditional leaders and the local & global elite.

Ghana’s journey towards independence in the late 1940s and early 1950s witnessed a crucial chapter marked by the “positive action” campaign. While earlier calls for reform and self-government had existed, this period saw a more focused and assertive movement led by Kwame Nkrumah and the Convention People’s Party (CPP). The campaign was born from a confluence of factors. Existing discontent with British rule was amplified by the 1948 riots, highlighting the need for decisive action.

Nkrumah, recently returned from studying abroad and deeply influenced by Gandhi’s non-violent resistance strategies, saw an opportunity. He mobilised the CPP and the public through rallies and speeches, galvanising a sense of collective purpose and demanding immediate self-government.

The youth played a central role in the fight for independence. Student groups and trade unions embarked on the “Positive Action” campaign in 1948, which involved strikes and boycotts to pressure the British government. The “Positive Action” campaign itself began in December 1949, inspired by Gandhi’s approach of non-violent methods to effect political change. Nkrumah emphasised discipline and non-violence, ensuring the campaign remained peaceful while achieving maximum impact.

The campaign faced significant challenges. The British authorities deployed various tactics, including curfews, arrests, and propaganda, to disrupt and undermine the movement. Yet, the CPP’s efforts resonated with the populace. The widespread participation in strikes, particularly in key sectors like transportation and commerce, effectively brought the country to a standstill.

The British eventually agreed to negotiate, recognising the growing momentum and potential for further disruption. However, negotiations stalled, leading to a continuation of the campaign. Notably, Nkrumah’s imprisonment during this period further fuelled public support and solidified his image as a symbol of resistance.

Ultimately, after 21 days of continuous “positive action,” the British came to the negotiating table again. Although the campaign itself officially ended, its legacy and impact were undeniable. The CPP secured major victories in subsequent elections, demonstrating the public’s overwhelming support for their vision of self-government.

This paved the way for further negotiations and, eventually, Ghana’s independence in 1957, with Nkrumah becoming the first Prime Minister.

In essence, the “Positive Action” campaign, together with the rallies and demonstrations led by CPP’s youth wing, proved to be a pivotal point in Ghana’s journey to independence despite its brief duration. It demonstrated the power of the youth, non-violent resistance, effective mobilisation, and unwavering public support in bringing about significant change [17].

Establishing a New Nation: Youth in Governance

Following Ghana’s independence, the youthful CPP Party achieved incredible feats of governance, notably increasing enrolment in basic education by over 200% through the execution of the Accelerated Education Development Plan of 1952 and the Education Act of 1961, which made primary education mandatory.

Kwame Nkrumah also established the Ghana Young Pioneers, which died after Nkrumah was overthrown but had a lot of impact in the years it was active. Beyond being a youth organisation confined within Ghana’s borders, the Ghana Young Pioneers (GYP), under Nkrumah’s leadership, transcended national boundaries by fostering Pan-Africanism among its young members.

Instead of operating in isolation, the GYP actively sought inspiration and resources from various corners of the world. The movement drew upon the Soviet Union’s emphasis on youth mobilisation, China’s cultural revolution, and the teachings of prominent Pan-African leaders. This global perspective went beyond mere intellectual influence. The GYP facilitated exchange programs with other youth organisations, allowing Ghanaian youth to connect with their African peers and cultivate a sense of shared Pan-African identity.

The movement didn’t just cultivate connections; it also incorporated diverse practices into its very fabric. The GYP curriculum and activities reflected this, drawing elements from various sources. The emphasis on physical training and discipline mirrored Israel’s approach, while the Soviet Union’s influence was evident in the focus on collective action and socialist values.

Even the materials associated with the GYP, such as uniforms and badges, often originated from different countries, serving as physical manifestations of their global network.

All these were deliberate strategies used by the GYP to solidify Pan-Africanism among Ghanaian youth. By strategically drawing upon diverse influences and forging global connections, the movement aimed to forge a shared Pan-African identity, challenge Western dominance through self-determination, and prepare future leaders for Ghana and Pan-Africa.

The GYP’s legacy extends beyond its specific achievements within Ghana. It serves as a testament to the potential of African youth movements to utilise global connections to strategically strengthen local identities and aspirations. By actively engaging with the world, the GYP not only fostered Pan-Africanism among its members but also challenged the existing power dynamics and contributed to the broader discourse of self-determination.

Coexisting with these developments was resistance to the CPP from university students who held opposing ideas on higher education. The CPP government envisioned universities as crucial instruments for national development. They aimed to nurture loyal citizens equipped with practical skills aligned with the nation’s socialist ideals. This vision translated into a “vocational” approach to education, prioritising courses deemed essential for the country’s progress.

However, this vision clashed with the aspirations of student activists.

Fuelled by the winds of decolonisation and rising Pan-Africanism, these young minds held a distinct perspective. They envisioned universities not just as factories producing skilled workers but as vibrant spaces fostering critical thought, intellectual freedom, and active engagement with societal issues. They yearned for an environment that encouraged autonomy and challenged the status quo, often finding themselves in disagreement with the government’s policies.

From boycotts and demonstrations to the formation of student unions, these student activists expressed their dissent and pushed for change. The government, threatened by this vocal resistance, attempted various tactics to control the narrative. They sought to influence student organisations, co-opt leaders through various means, and even resorted to censorship and repression to curb dissent.

However, the impact of student activism extended beyond immediate challenges to the government. The unwavering pursuit of their ideals ultimately contributed to developing a more dynamic and critical intellectual environment within Ghanaian universities. Despite the tensions and conflicts, their efforts played a role in shaping the future of higher education in Ghana [5].


Socioeconomic Welfare of the Youth After Independence

In the decade following the attainment of independence, the socio-economic welfare of the people of Gold Coast declined significantly. Metropolitan centres had seen a sharp increase in population during the interwar years; this pattern was repeated in the early twentieth century through to the 1960s.

Groups of mostly young men and some women migrated to urban areas to find employment and provide a better life for themselves and their children. The urban boom continued to escalate after the colonial reforms of the 1960s and 1970s due to the return of veterans and increased educational opportunities in urban areas. These migrants were unable to find employment, thus leading to delinquency and urban overcrowding.

This led to uprisings against the CPP by Accra and Kumasi youths, resulting in ethnically-based political parties. Notable of these was the Ga Shifimo Kpee (loosely translated to the “Ga Standfast Association”), which focused on four main issues: the selling of Ga lands to groups mostly made up of Akan “strangers,” urban overpopulation, the underrepresentation of Ga officials in the government, and job development. Ga teenagers staged protests in the streets weeks after the nation’s independence celebrations, making demands.

Furthermore, the National Liberation Movement (NLM) was formed by dissatisfied Ashanti youth of the CPP to oppose the government. The government identified that the absence of structure in the lives of young people had led to unrest and disorder. To counteract this, the Builder’s Brigade was established [6].

Youth in Post-Independence Governance

The Builder’s Brigade was a nationwide network of uniformed work camps that sought to mitigate unemployment and increased crime rates. These camps provided training in modern farming practices, modern agricultural practices, construction, sewing, and other craftwork for young men and women. The brigadiers were given employment, and some received free food, accommodation, and literacy classes.

The Brigade expanded quickly over the following two years to accommodate state employment needs. It went from its initial two camps in Accra and Damongo to twenty-four in mid-1959, with 8500 Ghanaians employed.

Three specifically designed female camps (Okponglo, Takoradi, and Jachie) were among these new camps. In the early years, these camps employed a total of 420 Ghanaian women. Therefore, by mid-1959, the government was asserting that the Brigade had reduced the number of Ghanaians who were officially unemployed by about 28% during its first few months of operation.

While the Builder’s Brigade increased employment, it inadvertently led to a disparity in employment between men and women, as fewer women than men benefitted from the initiative [3].

Youth Activism and National Development

Transnational education of the youth of Ghana also increased from 1957 to 1966, which incited Pan-African political agendas and activism in the youth. Ghana pursued various avenues for international education. The Commonwealth Scholarships provided a traditional path for Ghanaian students to study in other member nations. However, the Cold War presented new possibilities, with both the Western bloc and the communist world offering scholarships to Ghana, often with their own political agendas attached. Despite the potential strings attached, these scholarships diversified options for Ghanaian students.

Furthermore, Ghana itself took a proactive stance, offering “Freedom Fighters’ Scholarships” to young people from other African colonies still under colonial rule. This initiative stemmed from Ghana’s Pan-African aspirations and aimed to foster solidarity and support for the broader decolonisation movement across the continent.

Ghanaian students connected with other student organisations abroad, fostering a global network of activists. This international collaboration fostered a sense of shared struggle for social justice and fuelled their activism both in their host countries and neighbouring African countries [15].


Youth Representation in Modern Socio-Political Space

Following the overthrow of Kwame Nkrumah’s government in 1966, the political landscape in Ghana shifted dramatically. While Nkrumah’s regime had fostered engagement with student groups, subsequent governments viewed student activism with greater suspicion, sometimes resorting to suppression.

Nonetheless, more was needed to silence the voices of youth. Students and young people remained politically active throughout this period, organising protests and demonstrations and forming new organisations to advocate for their rights, educational reforms, and broader societal challenges.

Notably, the National Union of Ghanaian Students (NUGS) emerged as a powerful voice, amplifying their concerns and demands.

Students and youth groups often challenged the established order, arguing that a new generation of leadership was necessary to address the nation’s pressing issues. This debate permeated public discourse, media portrayals, and even artistic expressions, reflecting the ongoing struggle for power and a more inclusive national identity.

The rise and influence of the military in Ghanaian politics further complicated the equation. While students sometimes saw the military as a potential force for change, their relationship remained complex, marked by moments of both cooperation and conflict. They faced restrictions and repression at the hands of the military regime, highlighting the ongoing tensions between the desire for change and the realities of maintaining power [5].

However, the youth of Ghana have adequately maintained their participation in socio-politics through formal memberships in various political parties, indicating a clear commitment to the political process. Besides this, many young people, even without official membership, have actively participated by volunteering their time and energy to political campaigns, attending rallies, and mobilising their peers. This highlights a vibrant yet sometimes informal landscape of youth participation that goes beyond traditional party structures.

After the restriction on political activity was repealed in May 1992 in response to the referendum’s approval of the 1992 constitution, multiple political parties were established in The Fourth Republic of Ghana. Considering the youth’s enormous contribution to Ghana’s democratic transition and earlier democratic republics, the various political parties worked to organise them. As a result, party wings were established and have since grown to play a significant role in the organisation of political parties in Ghana.

For example, National Youth Organisers lead the NPP and the NDC youth wings. The youth have served as crucial links, disseminating party messages, mobilising voters, and providing crucial ground support during elections.

The NPP established the “Nasara” club among the “zongo” areas to increase the party’s youth support base. The NDC has also tried to revive the CPP’s old verandah boys and girls concept in the run-up to the 2000 elections. The NPP and NDC have expanded youth outreach to include postsecondary institutions. In Ghanaian higher institutions, for instance, the student wings of the NDC and NPP are represented by the “Tertiary Education Institution Networks (TEIN)” and “Tertiary Students Confederacy (TESCON)”, respectively [21].

Despite the youth’s continued political involvement, unlike the trend observed in various developed democracies, political ideology appears less central in driving their participation and shaping their political compass. Material incentives, ethnic ties and family influence have been determined as the major motivators for contemporary youth political participation [32].

Economic Empowerment and Entrepreneurship

Alongside the degeneration of political participation, the socio-economic welfare of the youth in Ghana has progressively worsened: 12% of the youth in Ghana are unemployed, and 65% of the youth are underemployed. Moreover, only 5% of graduates find employment after their mandatory National Service [30].

Furthermore, the youth who venture into entrepreneurship are faced with many obstacles. Financial constraints and limited access to training and skills development are among the major obstacles to setting up businesses.

The limited availability of crucial support services, such as mentorship, business guidance, and networking opportunities, also hinder young people from becoming fully realised entrepreneurs. Even in instances where the youth can start their businesses, bureaucracy, gender or tribal discrimination, and limited access to technology hamper the growth and survival of their businesses.

These factors have contributed to the accumulation of Ghanaian entrepreneurs in the informal sector, which is characterised by minimal growth and small-scale activities.

Fortunately, the government has sought to alleviate escalating unemployment and poverty rates by implementing several initiatives, notably the National Youth Employment Programme (NYEP) and the Youth Enterprise Fund (YEF).

The NYEP, established in 2001, adopts a multi-pronged approach to address youth unemployment through various modules. It offers the self-employment module, which provides training programs in business development, financial literacy, and marketing, potentially coupled with access to micro-loans to kickstart their ventures.

It also offers public service modules, which provide young people with temporary work placements within various government agencies or public institutions to give them a source of income and equip them with valuable skills and potential connections that could benefit their future careers. The vocational training and skills development module of NYEP also provides specific vocational training programs designed to prepare young people with practical skills relevant to specific industries or sectors, enhancing their employability and career prospects.

The YEF, launched in 2006, tackles the economy’s private sector by providing young entrepreneurs with access to financial resources to launch or expand their businesses. It offers microloans at lower interest rates than traditional financial institutions to balance the limited capital base of young entrepreneurs. Moreover, it organises mentorship programs, training workshops, and networking programs to holistically equip young entrepreneurs with the knowledge, skills, and networks necessary to navigate the complexities of running a successful business [22].

The Ministry of Finance has also embarked on the Program for Results (PforR) initiative, which utilises sponsorship from the World Bank to implement sector policies, regulations, and standards to promote investments and exports to increase youth employment.

Youth, Technology and Innovation

Technological innovations have also surfaced recently to facilitate entrepreneurship in Ghana. While Ghana’s technology industry is relatively early, some promising innovations have been launched.

To nurture technological innovation, the government organises Ghana Tech Summit, an annual gathering of investors, industry professionals, and stakeholders that explores new developments in the technology sector and provides a forum for discussing prospects and exchanging knowledge. The summit serves as an opportunity for networking and collaboration to safeguard the future of technology in Ghana. The National Entrepreneurship and Innovation Plan (NEIP) has also been implemented to support start-ups and reinforce technological innovation growth in Ghana [4].


Youth, Culture and National Identity

Through all these advancements and struggles to ensure the nation’s survival, the loss of nationalism and cultural identity by the average Ghanaian subjected to Western formal education has hampered communal and national growth by devaluing indigenous ideals and teaching capitalism.

The Western education system prioritises European languages, literature, history, and societal norms. This has led to a de-emphasis of Ghanaian languages, cultural practices, and traditional knowledge systems within the formal education curriculum and may have implicitly portrayed European cultures and values as superior, potentially leading to a sense of inadequacy or inferiority regarding Ghanaian cultural identity among students.

The emphasis on Western knowledge systems might have created a disconnect between young Ghanaians and their cultural heritage, potentially leading to a decline in the transmission of traditional knowledge and practices from older generations to younger ones. Moreover, Western education by the British colonial government coincided with the expansion of colonial economies and potential shifts towards market-oriented systems.

This broader historical context suggests a potential indirect impact of Western education on the introduction of capitalism in Ghana. Additionally, the focus on Western values and knowledge systems within the education system might have indirectly aligned with capitalist values, such as individual competition and economic progress [23].

However, the nation has made efforts through various means to battle the alienation the youth feel about their culture. The country has made efforts to preserve certain landmarks, such as the Elmina Castle, Okomfo Anokye’s sword, etc., to safeguard our history.

Programs such as Ghana’s Most Beautiful also provide a platform for showcasing Ghana’s rich culture.

Recently, the Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture has made provisions to involve the youth in preserving Ghana’s culture by introducing the World Folklore Day celebration, intending to kindle the interest of African youth in folklore. This is aimed at raising awareness about the folkloric traditions of the country. This initiative also aims to make Ghana a more attractive place for tourism and business investment [22][12][9].

Gender Dynamics and Youth

Another theme that has obstructed holistic development in Ghana is gender inequality across socio-economic spaces. While Ghana boasts a higher female labour force participation rate (65%) compared to the Sub-Saharan African average (63%), there continue to be disparities in economic opportunities for women in Ghana compared to men.

A significantly higher proportion of women (77%) compared to men (58%) are trapped in vulnerable jobs, often characterised by low wages and limited benefits. This vulnerability is further exacerbated by the dominance of women in the informal sector, where they often face challenges like self-employment with limited growth potential and lower earnings.

Furthermore, land ownership, a crucial economic asset, remains significantly skewed, with only 8% of women owning land compared to 30% of men. This disparity restricts women’s economic participation and limits their wealth-building ability.

Entrenched social norms also continue to act as powerful barriers, limiting women’s access to opportunities and hindering their participation in decision-making processes. The report highlights that the gender gap in decision-making power remains “high” within Ghana[25].

To alleviate these disparities, several NGOs have emerged, notably SocietyAid Ghana (SAID), Alliance for African Women Initiative (AFAWI), The Woman Empowerment Network, Songtaba, and WomensTrust. The government also has the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection, which tackles gender inequity and seeks to decrease domestic violence.


Globalisation and its Impact on Ghanaian Youth

Not ruling out colonisation but definitely adding the Ghanaian government’s desire to advance the economy, policies have been implemented to allow foreigners to trade freely and establish foreign companies for mineral exploration. These have hurt the Ghanaian youth by increasing poverty rates, as local entrepreneurs have been unable to compete with foreign products.

Moreover, Ghanaian youths are more exposed and vulnerable to adverse environmental conditions of political instability, economic crises, social repression, illiteracy, and substance use problems than their counterparts in other parts of the world, who benefit from the proceeds of economic advancement and political stability. Given these circumstances, it is hardly surprising that African youth are significantly less productive than their peers elsewhere in the world.

According to a World Bank survey of entrepreneurs done between 2001 and 2005, macroeconomic policies that do not favour entrepreneurs and deficiencies in public delivery systems are significant obstacles to the growth of entrepreneurship in Africa [2].


As Ghana strides into the future, the echoes of its past remain a guiding force. The journey of its youth, from the frontlines of colonial resistance to shaping modern socio-political landscapes, embodies an undying spirit of resilience and innovation. The legacy of the Gold Coast’s transformation into independent Ghana, spearheaded by visionary youths like Kwame Nkrumah and the restless energies of movements like the WAYL and Verandah Boys, still resonates in today’s struggles and triumphs.

Yet, the road ahead has its challenges. The dichotomy of embracing globalisation while preserving cultural identity, the ongoing quest for economic empowerment amidst persistent inequality, and the dynamic, often tumultuous, political landscape all demand a nuanced understanding and proactive engagement.

The youth of Ghana, once the harbingers of change, continue to be the country’s most vibrant resource. Our adaptability and creative spirit are crucial in navigating the complexities of a globalised world where technology and innovation play pivotal roles.

As we look to the future, it is clear that Ghana’s youth will be not only participants but also leaders in crafting a narrative that honours their rich heritage while boldly stepping into new frontiers. The aspirations for social justice, equality, and economic stability that once fuelled the independence movement are now transformed into a drive for sustainable development, inclusive growth, and a renewed sense of national identity.

Right now, Ghana stands at a crossroads, with its youth holding the key to a future as promising as it is challenging. By drawing on their historical legacy of activism and resilience, embracing the opportunities presented by technology and innovation, and navigating the socio-political complexities of modern times, we are well-positioned to shape a future that is not only prosperous but also reflective of the rich tapestry of Ghanaian identity and culture.

The youth, as always, remain the beacon of hope and the architects of a brighter, more inclusive tomorrow.

I hope you found this article to be an enjoyable read.

I wish you a highly productive and successful week ahead!


  1. “Vi. Colonization Leaders and Colonization Companies”, British Emigration to British North America, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 31 January 1961, doi:10.3138/9781442653177-009, ISBN 978-1-4426-5317-7
  2. Adewale, A. R. (2009). African Youth in the Globalised World: Challenges and Prospects of Educing Entrepreneurial Gains of Globalization. Universitatii Bucuresti. Analele. Seria Stiinte Economice si Administrative, 3, 3.
  3. Ahlman, J. S. (2012). A new type of citizen: youth, gender, and generation in the Ghanaian builders brigade. The Journal of African History, 53(1), 87-105.
  4. Asamoah, K. (2023, November 6). Why invest in Ghana’s tech startup scene? Ghana Investments Hub.
  5. Asiedu-Acquah, E. (2015). ” And still the Youth are coming”: Youth and popular politics in Ghana, c. 1900-1979 (Doctoral dissertation).
  6. Asiedu-Acquah, E. (2019). “We shall be outspoken”: Student political activism in post-Independence Ghana, c. 1957–1966. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(2), 169-188.
  7. Austin, D. (1964). Politics in Ghana, 1946-1960. (No Title).
  8. Caldow, Richard W.G.; Perrow, Martin R.; Allen, David; Black, Julie; Bond, Ian; Harwood, Andrew; Liley, Durwyn; McCulloch, Neil; Murphy, Matthew (2020), “Verifying predictions of statistical models to define the size and shape of marine Special Protection Areas for foraging seabirds (terns)”, Marine Protected Areas, Elsevier, pp. 543–572, doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102698-4.00028-9, ISBN 978-0-08-102698-4, S2CID 210621308
  9. Dennis, A. (2018). Promoting Ghana’s traditional cultural aesthetics in Ghana’s most beautiful reality television show. Legon Journal of the Humanities, 29(2), 176-196.
  10. Ghana Youth Environmental Movement (GYEM) TEST – Participedia. (n.d.).,-Videos%20https://&text=GYEM%20is%20a%20leading%20youth,address%20the%20global%20climate%20emergency.
  11. Ghanaians campaign for independence from British rule, 1949-1951 | Global Nonviolent Action Database. (n.d.).
  12. Gna. (2022, August 23). Youth policies to be developed to promote Ghana’s cultural heritage – Okraku Mantey | News Ghana. News Ghana.
  13. Hallett, R. Africa Since 1875 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1974).
  14. Kofi, T. A. (1972). The elites and underdevelopment in Africa: The case of Ghana. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 97-115.
  15. Laqua, D. (2023). The politics of transnational student mobility: youth, education and activism in Ghana, 1957–1966. Social History, 48(1), 87-113.
  16. McLaughlin & Owusu-Ansah (1994), “Britain and the Gold Coast: the Early Years”.
  17. Nkrumah, K. (1959). The Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah.
  18. Nti, K. (2013). This is our land: Land, policy, resistance, and everyday life in colonial southern Ghana, 1894–7. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 48(1), 3-15.
  19. Okeke-Agulu, C. (2015). Postcolonial modernism: Art and decolonization in twentieth-century Nigeria. Duke University Press.
  20. Osei, J. (2020). Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development in Ghana. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, Cham.
  21. Owusu Nsiah, I. (2019). ‘Who said we are politically inactive?’: A reappraisal of the youth and political party activism in Ghana 2004–2012 (A case of the Kumasi Metropolis). Journal of Asian and African studies, 54(1), 118-135.
  22. Owusu, G., Yankson, P. W., & Osei, R. D. (2016). Youth entrepreneurship in Ghana: current trends and policies. In Young entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 32-47). Routledge.
  23. Pinto, R. (2019). The effect of western formal education on the Ghanaian educational system and cultural identity. Journal of Negro Education, 88(1), 5-16.
  24. Schneider, Caroline (March 2015). “New deep-furrow drills could help more Pacific Northwest farmers move to conservation tillage”. Crops & Soils. 48 (2): 18–19. Bibcode:2015CrSo…48Q..18S. doi:10.2134/cs2015-48-2-3. ISSN 0162-5098.
  25. Siddiky, C. C. J. E. a. O. A., (2023, October 2). To reach Gender Equality Ghana needs to prioritize social and economic inclusion. World Bank Blogs.
  26. SocietyAid Ghana (SAID). (n.d.). Girls Not Brides.,education%20to%20the%20highest%20level.
  27. Songtaba. (2023, December 10). Home – Songtaba. Songtaba.,of%20the%20alleged%20witches%20camps.
  28. Spitzer, L., & Denzer, L. (1973). I. T. A. Wallace-Johnson and the West African Youth League. The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 6(3), 413. doi:10.2307/216610
  29. Staniland, Martin (1975). The Lions of Dagbon: Political Change in Northern Ghana. African Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-10143-1.
  30. The tales of the unemployed graduate in Ghana: The alternative to ’JAPKA ’ at all cost is worrying. (2024, January 27). GhanaWeb.
  31. Triulzi, Alessandro (April 1972). “The Asantehene-in-Council: Ashanti Politics Under Colonial Rule, 1935–1950”. Africa. 42 (2): 98–111. doi:10.2307/1158979. ISSN 0001-9720. JSTOR 1158979. S2CID 145298491
  32. Van Gyampo, R. E. (2012). The youth and political ideology in Ghanaian politics: The case of the fourth republic. Africa Development, 37(2), 137-165.
  33. Young African Leaders Initiative. (2021, September 8). Empowering women in Ghana through the WomanEmpowered Network – Young African Leaders initiative.,women%20physically%2C%20economically%20and%20socioculturally.